Toronto restaurants frustrated and confused after getting warnings from bylaw officers
- @thecatscradlebar
- Oct 23, 2020
- 3 min read
blogTO
Some Toronto restaurants have been getting warnings and fines from bylaw officers for their winterized patios, but many are confused as to exactly why.
Cat's Cradle on St. Clair West had already been dealing with the loss of income due to an 11 p.m. last call and a temporary ban on serving people indoors, just like every other restaurant and bar.
At least they finally thought they had found a solution to their ill-protected, uncomfortable patio with a heated covered option, but then a bylaw officer showed up saying it needed to be changed or they'd face a $10,000 fine.
"We do have a tiny street patio offered by the city, but nothing is allowed to be affixed and secured to the ground. Therefore, in this cold windy weather, we've already had a car hit our front patio, as well as the wind blow it four times into the street with the cars, and umbrellas for the rain also keep flying into the air," says owner Barbara Macphee.
"We have a small back patio, that we thought was a godsend in our desperate need. Back there we have an enclosed fence from most wind, which is also a permanent structure. And above we just put up a tarp to protect customers from the rain."
However, the permanent fencing structure that was to shield their customers from the elements is apparently a problem when it comes to bylaws.
"Recently, a health inspector came in and told us he got a complaint, and if we don't take down 75 per cent of our permanent fencing down by the next day, he is issuing us a $10,000 fine. He was gracious enough to give us a day to rectify the situation, he was supposed to issue us the fine right away," says Macphee.
"There are covered patios all around us, no airflow because everyone wants to trap the heat, and with nothing being done about it, because bylaw [officers] will only fine the business if someone has a complaint. Which doesn't seem fair either."
Macphee says Cat's Cradle is lucky to have survived this long, as additional costs like heating continue to add up while sales keep dropping, and that being slapped with a $10,000 fine would force them to close their doors.
They used the day grace period to remove 75 per cent of the fencing themselves with the help of customers.
"Across the street is a restaurant that is fully covered but is ignored by the city because no one complained. So how are we supposed to know what we can and can't do if rules are different for everyone apparently," continues Macphee.
"We can see right into the neighbours yard that's very unkempt so it's an ugly view. We have not talked to the neighbours about this yet so their piece of fence is still left up. We can't be asked to ask them to take it down for our air flow. And I hope the city doesn't expect that much more from us."
Comments